ORIGINAL: krunchie frog
If you don't know what they're protesting about, then I think you should find out before deciding whether they should move on or not.
Feel free to educate us all.
Is this a stance against the city? The government? St Paul's? Capitalism? Or pretty much everything that doesn't fit with the ideals of the people behind Occupy London? What they've actually achieved is to cause someone to resign who has little to do with their cause. If their fight is against the city then pitch the tents infront of the LSE or the Bank of England, don't drag the church into it, or maybe they're an easy vehicle for getting publicity for the cause?
The world financial crisis happened for lots of reasons, I didn't hear anyone complaining when they were mortgaging way beyond their means and spending like there's no tomorrow on bank loans and credit cards. The bankers were just selling on the mass of debt that the world was stacking up, when the world woke up and realised nobody was going to be able to pay most of it off the whole thing started to unravel and they took the blame. Now they're the new hate figures for anyone who feels the system doesn't quite work for them and their lifestyle.
Yes there's inequality of pay between rich bankers and poor people. There's also inequality between Footballers, Company Directors, Radio 1 DJs, Marketing Managers, Doctors, Lawyers, Pilots, Dentists, Engineers, Oil Workers, Surgeons and poor people. Should all of these people face reforms in the pay structure of the jobs they're worked hard to get into, just because they're paid more than is considered fair by those earning less?
Posted: 2011-11-01 10:21:39